Last year, the AncestryInsider reported that Ancestry.com had decided to sue Millennia for copyright infringement. That was not about their respective Family Tree Maker and Legacy Family Tree products, but about the packaging for those products. Ancestry.com claimed that Millennia’s package design for Legacy Family Tree was too similar to the packaging for Ancestry.com’s Family Tree Maker.
There was a huge huh-factor. Many Legacy users have never seen the packaging,
because they opt to download the product, and people who had seen both packages
were unlikely to be confused one way or another.
The Genealogue was quick with a brilliant blog post parodying the suit.
The real thigh-slapper was the suggestion that Millennia was deliberately opting for a similar design, to cash in on Family Tree Maker’s good name. Any suggestion that Ancestry.com started a nuisance lawsuit because it was jealous of Millennia being overwhelmed with orders for its Legacy Family Tree version 7 is of course complete and utter nonsense.
Part of Ancestry.com complaints concerned the style, the fonts and colours
for the words Family Tree
. I created a picture that shows various designs
alongside each other, and noted that Ancestry.com’s own design seemed inspired
by that for FamilyGathering.
I poked some more fun at Ancestry.com’s suggestion that Millennia was oh-so wrong to use a sans-serif font for Family Tree
, not only by
remarking that it is common typographical practice to use sans-serif for large
text,
but additionally by contrasting their design for Family Tree Maker
with the
design for Family Tree Magazine
.
All that was funny already, but the soap opera seemed really complete, when Ancestry.com introduced its jaipu.cn logo. Dean Richardson of GenLighten noticed that the jiapu.cn’s logo is remarkable similar to GenLighten’s logo.
I do wonder what happened to this lawsuit. Neither Ancestry.com nor Millennia has issued any statement about it. Anyway, I just recalled all this because the logo fun continues.
When FamilyLink first introduced the GenSeek site, it displayed a logo in the
upper right corner. I was more interested in the site than the logo, so I never
gave it much thought.
Today, playing with some Twitter tools that show many avatars at once, I was
struck by the similarity of the myfamily.com and GenSeek.com logo. Whether that
was because or despite the fact that GenSeek shows uses just a part of its logo
as its Twitter avatar, I do not know.
2009-03-18 12:13 TamuraJones The GenSeek & MyFamily logos are not dissimilar. Both 2-colour, green / brown, sans-serif, playful leaf, and grey ".com".
I’ve collected some logos together to show what that tweet was about.
This image does not just show the already mentioned MyFamily and GenSeek logos, but the Ancestry.com and RootsWeb logos as well. The Ancestry.com, MyFamily.com and RootsWeb.com share obvious similarities.
All three designs use the same three colours. The Ancestry.com logo is the
odd one out for using a serif typeface and a single-word name. The MyFamily and
RootsWeb logo both use sans-serif and use two colours to highlight
that the name consist of two words. All the logos add a stylised leaf as an
accent. All three logo have a grey .com
at the end.
These similarities are a visual identity, visual cues that these various
brands are part of the same company. The GenSeek logo fits in very well. Its use
sans-serif type, uses the two-tone green and brown to distinguish the two parts
of the name from each other, it has a playful stylised leaf as an accent, and the visual
identity is completed by the grey .com
at the end.
There is just one problem: GenSeek is a branch of a different tree. Ancestry.com, MyFamily.com and RootsWeb.com all belong to The Generations Network, while GenSeek belongs to FamilyLink.
It is not hard to muster some arguments in FamilyLink’s defence. Use of
sans-serif is pretty normal, and in fact a difference instead of similarity with
the Ancestry.com logo. The MyFamily and RootsWeb logo use lower-case letters
only, despite the common IniCaps spelling of those name, while the GenSeek logo
uses IniCaps.
Use of two-tone names is far from unique, and use of trees or leaves in logos is
something many genealogical companies do. The use of an magnifying glass in the
GenSeek logo, although so obvious and worn-out as a metaphor for search that it
can hardly be called creative, is a remarkably fresh and unique take on
genealogical logo design compared to the overabundance of logos with trees,
leaves and branches in them.
The GenSeek logo uses a fresh bright spring green instead of the almost pukey
yellowish autumn green that the Ancestry.com logos use, but there is still the
identical grey .com
at the end, which really makes the GenSeek logo fit in so
well. You'd think these are all branches of the same tree.
FamilyLink has developed a GenSeek application for FaceBook. See GenSeek for FaceBook, which reveals the GenSeek on FaceBook application including GenStream and the new GenSeek logo.
I guess the issues discussed above were serious enough to redo the logo. The new logo features the same stylised figure and rounded letters as other FamilyLink logos.
Just came across Evan McDonald’s web site, which has a page about the GenSeek logo design he did in February of 2009.
FamilyLink Vice President of Marketing Jim Ericson answered some questions about the logo change and sent me the official new logo for the GenSeek site, which has slightly different colours and shapes than the logo used for the FaceBook app.
The new design shows multiple stylised figures connected by a shadow, in which you can recognise a minimal family tree. That suggests genealogy much more than an hourglass does. The stylised figure is one FamilyLink is using for multiple logos, to provide an easily recognisable corporate identity, and communicates that GenSeek is a FamilyLink service.
Evan Made has deleted the GenSeek logo project from his site. The broken link has been removed.
Copyright © Tamura Jones. All Rights reserved.